May 27, 2011: An Incredible Hole | May 26 | May 28 | 2011 | FOTD Home |
Fractal
visionaries
and enthusiasts:
Today's
image shows
one of the many holes that lie near the base of the hook in the image
of May 23, when the exponent of the image is lowered from 1.08 to 1.078
and the minibrot tracked down.
I named today's image "An Incredible Hole" because in some ways the
attributes of the central hole are as unbelievable as some of the kooky
claims now circulating among the credulous. (But remember
that a
claim is not necessarily false simply because rationalists disbelieve
it.)
To emphasize the hole's unusual qualities, I brought it to active life
by rendering the scene with the inside set to 'bof61'. (When
the
hole appears as a flat black area, some of its impact is
lost.)
The bluish-pink coloring of the hole is unintentional. It
came
about by lucky accident.
The hole is a true hole, and not simply an artifact of too low a
maxiter. I tested the scene with a maxiter of 1,000,000 and
found
the hole unchanged.
The amazing thing about this hole became obvious when I decided to
count the number of large lobes around its edge. After
several
failed attempts to get an exact count, I realized that I would never
get the count correct, for the large and small lobes with all their
sub- and sub-sub-lobes, are of one and the same series. The
total
number of lobes is therefore infinite.
The inside of the hole in today's image is actually an extension of the
minibrot in the original 'minibrot for the ages' image. The
original minibrot extends invisibly under the surface debris of the
original image, well beyond the hook.
The rating of an 8 seems justified. If I had put a bit more
effort into the coloring, I might have rated it an 8-1/2.
Thursday turned into a midsummer-like day here at Fractal Central, with
enough heat, haze and humidity to satisfy the most ardent hot weather
lover. The high temperature of 90F 32C totally satisfied the
fractal cats, who stretched to their full cat lengths to show their
pleasure. As of post time, a warning on the TV Weather
Channel (I
call it the Commercial Channel) of possible tornadoes in the area had
proved to be a scare rather than a forecast.
The humans had a relatively slow day, which was good in some ways, but
not so good in others. If nothing goes wrong, which is
usually
the case, the next FOTD will be posted in 24 hours. Until
then,
take care, and yesterday's kookiness sometimes proves to be today's
scientific fact, but before the question is settled scientifically, how
does one tell the true kookiness from the kooky kookiness?
Jim Muth
jimmuth@earthlink.net
START PARAMETER FILE=======================================
An_Incredible_Hole { ; time=0:08:12.85-SF5 on P4-2000
reset=2004 type=formula formulafile=basicer.frm
formulaname=MandelbrotBC3 function=recip passes=1
center-mag=-0.000750885846/+1.174041344618/144809\
/1/-47.5/0 params=1.078/0/16/525 float=y
maxiter=4000 inside=bof61 logmap=-250 periodicity=6
colors=000zf0ze0ze0zc0yb0yb0wa0va0v_0tZ0tZ0sX0qX0q\
W0pW0pU0oT0mT0mR0lR0zhvjQ0iO0zaohN0hM0zUhfK0eI0vNU\
cH0oFNoF0h7F_E0a07ZC0Z07aB0W00W00U70U00T60R00R40Q2\
0Q00O00N00N00L00J00H00G00F00F00C00A007009005005002\
00300800A00H00H20N40N60O70Q90QB0RC0TC0TE0UF0UH0WI0\
XK0XM0ZN0_O0_Q0aR0aT0eU0hW0mX0rX0vZ0z_0za0zb0zd0zg\
0zi0zl0zm0zm0zm0zm0zm0zm0zm0zl0zk0zj0zi0wh0wh0yh0y\
h0zh0zh0zh0zh0zh0zh0zh0zh0zh0zh2zh2yh4wh4ehZehZfh_\
fh_hh_hhaihaihaihajhbjhbjhblhblhblhcmhczUczUczUczU\
czUezUezUezUezUezUfzUfzUfzUfzUfzUfzUhzehzchzbhzahz\
_izZizXizWizUizTizRjzQjzOjzNjzMjzKlzIlzHlzFlzElzCl\
zBmz9mz7mz6mz4mz2oz0oz0oz0oz0zz0zzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzK\
zzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKztKzvKzvKzvKzwKzwKzw\
KzyKzyKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzKzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUz\
zUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzU\
zzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUzzUz }
frm:MandelbrotBC3 { ; by several Fractint users
e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100
p=real(p2)+PI
q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI))
r=real(p2)+PI-q
Z=C=Pixel:
Z=log(Z)
IF(imag(Z)>r)
Z=Z+flip(2*PI)
ENDIF
Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C
|Z|<a }
END PARAMETER FILE=========================================