June 12, 2011: Take Your Choice | June 11 | June 13 | 2011 | FOTD Home |
Fractal
visionaries
and enthusiasts:
Today's
image is in
two parts, the lower left half and the upper right half. The
viewer may choose which half he prefers. The lower left half
is
intact, while the upper right half is partially evaporated, with the
evaporation front running diagonally through the central
minibrot. The strange bailout value assigned the imag(p3)
parameter controls the position of the evaporation front.
The coloring is quite different in the opposing halves. I
have
worked on the coloring to emphasize the difference, but the result
still rates no higher than a 6. The coloring effect in the
upper
right half was achieved by rendering the image with the inside set to
'zmag'. The other inside fills have varying effects.
Actually, the image holds an error. I had intended to enter
8.8
as the value of the imag(p2) parameter, but somehow the decimal point
never showed up, and I didn't notice the value of 88 until the image
was completed. It was another of those serendipitous
accidents
that happen so often in fractals.
The name "Take Your Choice" implies that the viewer can have it both
ways. Those who prefer the lower left half of the image may
reduce the bailout a bit and get an entire image like the lower left
half. Those who prefer the upper right half may simply
increase
the bailout. (Setting the inside fill to 'bof61' has the same
effect as lowering the bailout.)
A mix of sun and clouds, with a few sprinkles of rain and a temperature
of 86F 30C, made Saturday a routine weather day here at Fractal
Central. The fractal cats forgot the day even before it began.
I took things as easy as possible, aided by FL, who came to the rescue
when I showed signs of doing some useful work. In reply, I
gave
her some morale support when she went to work in her garden.
The
next FOTD will be posted in 24 hours. My next fractal 'hot'
spell
is due soon, so check then to see it it has arrived yet.
Until
next time, take care, and if a physicist should prove that the world is
not real. Would his proof be real . . . ?
Jim Muth
jimmuth@earthlink.net
START PARAMETER FILE=======================================
Take_Your_Choice { ; time=0:04:45.38-SF5 on P4-2000
reset=2004 type=formula formulafile=basicer.frm
formulaname=MandAutoCritInZ function=recip passes=1
center-mag=+1.433407804720116/+0.02731266503619226\
/1.578536e+008/1/-132.5/0 params=3/-1.8/0.6/-88/0\
/1.233827121e+027/0/0 float=y maxiter=1600
inside=zmag logmap=170 periodicity=6
colors=000rU2cY2a`1_c0Zf0Yc2Xa4W_6VX7UV9TTBSRDSOER\
MGQKIPIKOFLNDNMBPM9QOEPPJORONSTMUXLVYKXYJYYIZYHYYL\
XYPWQTVHcU9_J6I831A25B28D2BE2EG2HH2LJ2OK2RM2UN2XNE\
`NQcNafNmiNylMvkMtkLrkLpkLmjKkjKijJgjJdiJbiI`iIZiI\
Xi6A`5Ob4ad3neArOHu6MdFROOV8WYJc`TjR_lHfm7mn8qs9tx\
LsmXschrTtrJgoRVlZJieGfWDdMAbC7`3DZLIXbNVsawmQIMqu\
w`dtuy7hlNW`bNeDM_RLUdS_8QXKOUWMRgC13F9LIHa1ia8bgE\
WmgBMWIbFKiINny0an7fdDjUJn0XR7U`ERigxCWfYGXEHVPITZ\
JRhrap`VqppBgiM_bXSWgkk3YM3ROT1Gv8JtEMsEmUH`frPp`P\
q73OB9WEEcHKkPwO6zO2jU8bbEWjMsW74RBAYEFdHKktVlaSob\
VJNsBuOLbPawbdiYiXTnk7SYGeKq3QmtN`sro``aiif7``NSVb\
s80jDEaHSTLe_Edy`7kXNYTbqz6HdJI_VJUf_`UUXbPTj3bP8Z\
XCWcGSkZJ1RMSzG2oJGdLTUNe5My_cWUZcPUkN8mMEoLKqoPqd\
PrUPrkoJafVTYfHfJtuvgjtW_sGU6tU28gQBbYEYdHTknxPclZ\
U`homO_`c7hqJ2EKEZK1wK7uKDtKJsOUdMSiLQnlpsbfrTYrWP\
9QPWY7URGfcVdMnCLeR000B00 }
frm:MandAutoCritInZ {; Jim Muth
a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2),
g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(((-a*b*g*h)^j)+(p4)),
k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel):
z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c,
|z| < l }
END PARAMETER FILE=========================================